So. Let us talk briefly about Once Upon A Time.

Season Premiere Spoilers Under Here! )


Answer to last Sunday's song: 
30 day meme day 19:The style of clothing you feel most comfortable in: )

Also, my BFF Abby has started a new blog, called [livejournal.com profile] bizarrevictoria, which, in her own words, is about the following: "Fairly or unfairly, the [Victorian] aristocracy have always had a reputation for eccentricity, and this blog is dedicated to capturing and sharing some of their finest real-life and fictional moments of bizarreness." Abby has a real way with words, and she's not joking about the eccentricity.

Go check it out! Even if you know nothing about the Victorian period (like me) you won't be disappointed. The posts are all absolutely hilarious, and how can you resist a blog that's, "a place [to] recount the abject loopiness of something and ask, "WHYYY?" without worrying about finding an answer"?

As the title indicates, this is the last installment in my In Defense of Disney Series. All the other essays can be read by clicking on the 'in defense of disney' tag, and I hope everyone has enjoyed reading them!


Character: Jasmine, from Aladdin

Criticism: “This princess must get married to satisfy the requirements of the law. Her reluctance to do so causes her powerful father no end of trouble. She is enslaved by a powerful man and is only saved by the wit of a street rat.”


Cut for length and TW for enslavement (is that a trigger? I'm not sure, so I'm warning for it) )


Next up: I'm considering a passionate treatise on how much I fucking love The Princess and the Frog, but I'm not really sure I will. Tiana is a beautiful example of a more modern Disney princess/heroine, but I don't have the experience necessary to discuss the race issue in any detail, and it might be doing everyone a disservice to leave it out. On the other hand, I love Tiana, and as the movie makes her race a non-issue, perhaps I could too. I'm torn.

This one is short enough that I'm not even going to bother with a cut. I hardly need to go on at length about Belle, both because the criticism of her is so short, and because it’s ridiculously obvious to anyone who’s actually watched Beauty and the Beast that she is a badass.


Character: Belle, from Beauty and the Beast (1992)

Criticism: “Saves a prince’s life. With her only asset, her sexuality.”

Again, did you even watch Beauty and the Beast? The way to save the prince was for him to love someone, and earn her love in return. That means that 1. It was Belle’s love, not her looks, that saved the day, and 2. It had to go both ways; she had to be a strong enough person to love him as the beast in order for the spell to break, and an awesome enough woman for him to love her back. It wasn’t “find a hot chick and love her” it was “find someone, who you can love, who will also love you back, even though you’re both a big hairy beast and kind of an asshole.” Plus, if you’ve ever had any kind of dating life at all, you know how hard it can be to find someone you can stand to be around for more than five minutes at a time, never mind someone you can love for all eternity.

Additionally, Belle does save the beast’s life several times using things other than her sexuality. Once, she hauls his unconscious ass back from the snowy forest, when she could have just ridden home and left him to freeze/bleed to death or be eaten by the wolves. If anything, her being a woman is a disadvantage here (I still don’t know how she heaved his bulk onto that horse, being a country girl who reads in her spare time, not lifts weights, but I imagine a feat of strength akin to women lifting cars off their children. Or, you know, he came to long enough to help her, but the first option is more fun.) Then, during the climactic fight, Belle pulls the Beast towards her after he gets stabbed, preventing him from plummeting to his doom, and then helps him climb back over the railing so she can profess her love and save him again (both from succumbing to his wounds, since apparently the transformation also heals him, and from being a beast forever).

Besides the life saving, Belle is also smart, well read, unafraid of shouting matches with the beast, loves her father, and has a million other excellent traits, including patience, kindness, self-sacrifice, a longing for more than a provincial life, some form of medical knowledge, the ability to take talking objects in stride, and excellent aim with a snowball. How is her sexuality her only asset? She saves the beast because they fall in love, and they fall in love because she’s an awesome person, as well as because she can see past his rough exterior. Her being beautiful is just a perk, really. If Belle had been pretty but stupid, or mean, or shallow, it never would have worked. Her asset, with which she saves Beast, is all of her, and how dare anyone reduce her to just a pretty face?

And of course there’s the magically magical love in general, which not even beastliness, Gaston, or stab wounds to the kidney can thwart.


All the other essays in this series can be accessed via the 'in defense of Disney' tag.

Character: Ariel, from The Little Mermaid (1989)

Criticism: “This one drastically changes her physical appearance so as to be more attractive to a man. The price is that she can’t speak. No problem, she has nothing of value to say anyhow. She is saved by a prince.”


Cut for length, no triggers )

To read the rest of the entries in this series, please click on the 'in defense of disney' tag.
Character: Aurora/Briar Rose, from Sleeping Beauty (1959)

Criticism: “Betrothed at birth to solidify a political position, she is killed by another woman out of spite. Her owner… ahem… fiancé saves her with a kiss. Again, sex is her only salvation.”

Cut simply for length )


To see the two previous entries in this series, please click on the 'in defense of disney' tag.

Character: Cinderella, from Cinderella (1950)

Criticism: “She is saved from terrible living conditions by a prince. He does this, not because she’s such a hard worker, but because she’s beautiful.”



Trigger Warning: Brief mention (we're talking Disney here) of abuse and rape below the cut )
What follows is the first in a several part essay I've been working on, that defends Disney Princesses. I was originally going to post the whole thing, but it is INCREDIBLY long, so I'm doing it in parts instead. Enjoy!

Also, even though it's mild, trigger warning for discussion of abuse.

Cut for picture and length )
Hey Hollywood?

The next time you think to yourself, "let's update a classic children's book, and by update I mean strip it of everything that made children love it in the first place and instead insert sap and slapstick, and make it into a movie with Jim Carrey!" Do me a favor, and don't.
 You know what? I like Jennifer Lopez. And I like Avril Lavigne. I like songs by Toby Keith, but he's kind of an asshole. I don't like Vince Vaughn. I don't ever want to see Anchorman, because I'm not overly find of Will Ferrell. I like the Owen brothers. I like Hayden Christensen. I like Claire Danes. I don't like Fergie. I love Fullmetal Alchemist and Inuyasha. I don't find Sarah Silverman particularly funny. There's lots of stuff/people I like and don't like.


But mostly, I hate feeling like I have to apologize for these opinions.

Profile

Megan

April 2017

S M T W T F S
      1
2 34 5678
9 101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30      

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 17th, 2025 03:58 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios